[ Discussions | TOC | Search | Post | Reply ]
Category:
From: LarryIsolf
Date: 31 May 2017
Time: 14:10:40
Remote Name: 195.68.203.179
?How to put in writing a Comparative Analysis Throughout your academic career, you'll be asked to write down papers in which you compare and contrast two things: two texts, two theories, two historical figures, two scientific processes, and so on. "Classic" compare-and-contrast papers, in which you weight A and B equally, may be about two similar things that have crucial differences (two pesticides with different effects to the environment) or two similar things that have crucial differences, yet turn out to have surprising commonalities (two politicians with vastly different world views who voice unexpectedly similar perspectives on sexual harassment). During the "lens" (or "keyhole") comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you make use of a as a lens through which to watch B. Just as shopping through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, by making use of A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see B. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of the thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa. Faced along with a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may really feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you primary state all the elements that A and B have in familiar, and then state all the ways in which A and B are different. Predictably, the thesis of this kind of a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. To put in writing a decent compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data-the similarities and differences you've observed-and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. Right here are the 5 things required. Frame of Reference . This is the context inside of which you site the two things you plan to compare and contrast; it is the umbrella below which you have grouped them. The frame of reference may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory; a group of similar things from which you extract two for special attention; biographical or historical advice. The most popular frames of reference are constructed from distinct resources rather than your unique thoughts or observations. Thus, inside of a paper comparing how two writers redefine social norms of masculinity, you would be more suitable off quoting a sociologist within the topic of masculinity than spinning out potentially banal-sounding theories of your have. Most assignments tell you exactly what the frame of reference should be, and most courses supply resources for constructing it. At any time you encounter an assignment that fails to offer a frame of reference, you must come up with an individual on your possess. A paper without this kind of a context would have no angle in the material, no focus or frame with the writer to propose a meaningful argument. Grounds for Comparison . Let's say you're composing a paper on international food distribution, and you've chosen to compare apples and oranges. Why these particular fruits? Why not pears and bananas? The rationale behind your choice, the grounds for comparison . allows your reader know why your choice is deliberate and meaningful, not random. For instance, within a paper asking how the "discourse of domesticity" has long been put to use while in the abortion discussion, the grounds for comparison are obvious; the issue has two conflicting sides, pro-choice and pro-life. Inside a paper comparing the effects of acid rain on two forest sites, your choice of sites is less obvious. A paper focusing on similarly aged forest stands in Maine plus the Catskills will be setup differently from a particular comparing a new forest stand inside the White Mountains using an old forest within the same region. You should have to indicate the reasoning behind your choice. Thesis. The grounds for comparison anticipates the comparative nature of your thesis. As in any argumentative paper, your thesis statement will convey the gist of your argument, which necessarily follows from your frame of reference. But inside of a compare-and-contrast, the thesis relies upon on how the two things you've chosen to compare actually relate to 1 another. Do they prolong, corroborate, complicate, contradict, correct, or discussion just one another? During the most familiar compare-and-contrast paper-one focusing on differences-you can indicate the precise relationship relating to A and B by employing the word "whereas" inside your thesis: Whereas Camus perceives ideology as secondary to the absolutely need to address a particular historical moment of colonialism, Fanon perceives a revolutionary ideology as being the impetus to reshape Algeria's history in the direction toward independence. Whether your paper focuses primarily on difference or similarity, you should have to make the relationship relating to A and B clear on your thesis. This relationship is for the heart of any compare-and-contrast paper. Organizational Scheme. Your introduction will include your frame of reference, grounds for comparison, and thesis. There are two standard ways to organize the body of your paper. In text-by-text . you discuss all of the, then all of B. In point-by-point . you alternate points about A with comparable points about B. Once you think that B extends A, you'll probably utilize a text-by-text scheme; in the event you see A and B engaged in discussion, a point-by-point scheme will draw attention to the conflict. Be aware, however, that the point-by- point scheme can come off as a ping-pong game. You may avoid this effect by grouping even more than a person point together, thereby cutting down around the variety of times you alternate from the to B. But no matter which organizational scheme you choose, you absolutely need not give equal time to similarities and differences. In fact, your paper will be a good deal more interesting if you ever get to the heart of your argument as fairly quickly as workable. Thus, a paper on two evolutionary theorists' different interpretations of exact archaeological findings may very well have as handful of as two or three sentences around the introduction on similarities and at most a paragraph or two to put together the contrast relating to the theorists' positions. The rest belonging to the paper, whether organized text- by-text or point-by-point, will treat the two theorists' differences. You could organize a classic compare-and-contrast paper either text-by-text or point-by-point. But inside of a "lens" comparison, in which you spend significantly less time over a (the lens) than on B (the focal textual content), you almost always organize text-by-text. That's when you consider that A and B are not strictly comparable: A is merely a device for helping you discover whether or not B's nature is actually what expectations have led you to definitely believe it is. Linking of the and B . All argumentative papers require you to definitely link each individual point with the argument again to the thesis. Without these kinds of links, your reader will be unable to see how new sections logically and systematically advance your argument. In a very compare-and contrast, you also have to make links among A and B during the body of your essay at any time you want your paper to hold together. To make these links, use transitional expressions of comparison and contrast ( similarly, moreover, likewise, for the contrary, conversely, over the other hand ) and contrastive vocabulary (from the example below, Southerner/Northerner ). As a girl raised from the faded glory from the Old South, amid mystical tales of magnolias and moonlight, the mother remains part of the dying technology. Surrounded by hard times, racial conflict, and confined opportunities, Julian, about the other hand . feels repelled by the provincial nature of home, and represents a new Southerner, a single who sees his indigenous land through a condescending Northerner's eyes. Copyright 1998, Kerry Walk, for your Composing Center at Harvard University <a href=http://fortheloveof.org.uk/what-could-be-the-future-of-printed-textbooks/>pay for essays</a>